Brooks v. Patterson
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. Cas. 133
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. Patterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Johns. Cas. 102 →
Opinion
THE defendant pleaded in abatement his privilege as an attorney of the court; the plaintiff replied, “ that on the day of exhibiting the bill, and for a “ long time before, to wit, for the space of one whole “ year, the defendant had entirely ceased to practise 6C as an attorney of this court, and had wholly abanu doned the profession, business, practice and calling [134]*134“ of an attorney of this court,” &c. demurrer and joinder in demurrer.
The court held the replication sufficient to oust the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Patterson, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 133, 1 Cole. Cas. 133 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 133 (Brooks v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.