Brooks v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Brooks v. Page

1968 OK CR 161, 444 P.2d 847, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 4, 1968

DocketNo. A-14754

StatusPublished

This text of 1968 OK CR 161 (Brooks v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. Page, 1968 OK CR 161, 444 P.2d 847, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

The petitioner herein seeks an order of this Court directing that the Respondent grant him certain time allegedly spent in the Oklahoma County jail prior and subsequent to his conviction for the offense of Illegal Possession of Narcotic Drugs, which said judgment and sentence was affirmed by this Court in Brooks v. State, Okl.Cr., 438 P.2d 25.

Petitioner does not attach any exhibits to his petition and it is readily apparent that he has not completed serving the judgment and sentence for which he is currently incarcerated. Under these circumstances we are of the opinion that the relief prayed for should be, and the same is hereby denied, without prejudice to the petitioner filing a Petition for Habeas Corpus if he is retained beyond the term for which he is currently sentenced, taking into account all credits and good time to which he is entitled.

The relief prayed for is accordingly denied. Writ denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge.

The petitioner herein seeks an order of this Court directing that the Respondent grant him certain time allegedly spent in the Oklahoma County jail prior and subsequent to his conviction for the offense of Illegal Possession of Narcotic Drugs, which said judgment and sentence was affirmed by this Court in Brooks v. State, Okl.Cr., 438 P.2d 25.

Petitioner does not attach any exhibits to his petition and it is readily apparent that he has not completed serving the judgment and sentence for which he is currently incarcerated. Under these circumstances we are of the opinion that the relief prayed for should be, and the same is hereby denied, without prejudice to the petitioner filing a Petition for Habeas Corpus if he is retained beyond the term for which he is currently sentenced, taking into account all credits and good time to which he is entitled.

The relief prayed for is accordingly denied. Writ denied.

NIX, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1968 OK CR 161, 444 P.2d 847, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-page-oklacrimapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack