Brooks v. Orange Rice Mill Co.
This text of 183 N.C. 677 (Brooks v. Orange Rice Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no reason shown for disturbing-the results of this trial. It was earnestly urged for appellant that there was no evidence in denial of the intervener’s claim of ownership, but this same position was taken on the former trial, and the Court then held, that on the testimony of the intervener, there were facts in evidence challenging its claim, and requiring that the issue be submitted to the jury. See Brooks v. Mill Co., 182 N. C., 258. On practically the same evidence, the court, in pursuance of said decision, submitted the cause to the j ury, who have found, as stated, against the intervener’s claim.
We find in the present trial
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 N.C. 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-orange-rice-mill-co-nc-1922.