Brooks v. Nutt

4 D.C. 470

This text of 4 D.C. 470 (Brooks v. Nutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Nutt, 4 D.C. 470 (circtddc 1834).

Opinion

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

was of opinion that the law was for the defendant, and that the plaintiff is a slave.

(See the ease of Negroes Peter and Lewis v. Cureton and Preuss, (2 Cranch, C. C. 561.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peter & Lewis v. Cureton
19 F. Cas. 312 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1825)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 D.C. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-nutt-circtddc-1834.