Brooks v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
82 N.Y.S. 1096
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 1903·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained, and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the question of defendant’s negligence was one of fact for the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. New York Cent. & H. R. R., 82 N.Y.S. 1096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
82 N.Y.S. 1096 (Brooks v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Binswanger v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
94 N.Y.S. 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)