Brooks v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California·Decided September 2, 2025·No. 1:23-cv-05512·Unknown

Opinion

□□□ ~ AN Berkeley Office West Oakland Office — |} i 2150 Dwight Way 2601 San Pablo Ave. =_—" Berkeley, CA 94704 Oakland, CA, 94612 homeless (510) 540-0878 tel (510) 695-2260 tel ACTION CENTER (510) 540-0403 fax (510) 858-7867 fax

RACHAEL HOLMES Attorney for Plaintiff Homeless Action Center 2150 Dwight Way Berkeley, CA 94704 (510) 698-1620 (510) 540-0403 fax rholmes@homelessactioncenter.org

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Tyrrell Brooks, ) CIVIL NO. 1:23-cv-05512-RMI Plaintiff, } Vv. Kilolo Kyakazi, Commissioner of Social Security ) Defendant.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiffs counsel, as Plaintiff's assignee, be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of seven thousand eight hundred dollars ($7800.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §$§ 1920, 2412(d). This stipulation does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of $7800.00 in EAJA attorney fees shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees, expenses, and/or costs in connection with this action.

After this Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Commissioner will consider the matter of Plaintiffs assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. The ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program and the Commissioner will determine whether the fees are subject to an offset. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010). Any payment shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a Federal debt, then the Commissioner shall cause the payment of fees and costs to be made directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the assignment executed by Mr. Brooks (attached). This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiffs counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: 3/25/25 ALAMEDA COUNTY HOMELESS ACTION CENTER By: /s/ Rachael L. Holmes Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Rami M. Vanegas Attorney for Defendant

Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of EAJA Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount seven thousand eight hundred dollars ($7800.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. $§ 1920.2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation.

Dated: September 2, 2025 ME HONORABLE ROBERT M. ILLMAN United States District Court Magistrate

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Kijakazi, (N.D. Cal. 2025).

Brooks v. Kijakazi (Brooks v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)