Brooks v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Brooks v. Johnson

670 F. App'x 98

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2016·No. No. 16-6512·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Johnson, No. 2:15-cv-01074-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 11 & May 25, 2016). We deny Brooks’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Johnson, No. 2:15-cv-01074-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 11 & May 25, 2016). We deny Brooks’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Brooks v. Johnson, 670 F. App'x 98 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 98 (Brooks v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related