Brooks v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

Brooks v. Johnson

26 F. App'x 370

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2002·No. No. 01-2032·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles E. Brooks appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Brooks contends that the district court erred in finding defendant Lloyd Albert Johnson, a Maryland Assistant State’s Attorney, was entitled to qualified immunity. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion show the district court correctly found Johnson was entitled to qualified immunity. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Brooks’ civil action.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles E. Brooks appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Brooks contends that the district court erred in finding defendant Lloyd Albert Johnson, a Maryland Assistant State’s Attorney, was entitled to qualified immunity. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion show the district court correctly found Johnson was entitled to qualified immunity. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Brooks’ civil action.

AFFIRMED.

Brooks v. Johnson, 26 F. App'x 370 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

26 F. App'x 370 (Brooks v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.