Brooks v. Jamesville & Washington Railroad

115 N.C. 624
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Avery, J.:

Though a critical examination of the assignments of error shows that some of the instructions given to the jury and excepted to by defendant were erroneous, upon different grounds, yet we deem it best to hold that this case depends upon the principle announced in the opinion in Hansley v. Railroad, filed at this term, in reference to the allowance of vindictive damages, and therefore we grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Jamesville & Washington Railroad, 115 N.C. 624 (N.C. 1894).

115 N.C. 624 (Brooks v. Jamesville & Washington Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purcell v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
12 S.E. 954 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)