Brooks v. Hydorn

Michigan Supreme Court

Brooks v. Hydorn

1 McGrath 1182, 76 McGrath 273

DecidedJuly 11, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1182 (Brooks v. Hydorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. Hydorn, 1 McGrath 1182, 76 McGrath 273 (Mich. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to deliver the files records and dockets belonging to his office, as a justice of the peace of the City of Grand Hapids, to another justice, as provided by Act No. 200, Laws of 1889.

[1183]*1183Denied July 11, 1889.

Held, that tbe act referred to, which assumes to reduce the number of justices in said city to two and to legislate two of such officers out of office, is unconstitutional, the title failing to indicate any such object.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to deliver the files records and dockets belonging to his office, as a justice of the peace of the City of Grand Hapids, to another justice, as provided by Act No. 200, Laws of 1889.

[1183]*1183Denied July 11, 1889.

Held, that tbe act referred to, which assumes to reduce the number of justices in said city to two and to legislate two of such officers out of office, is unconstitutional, the title failing to indicate any such object.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1182, 76 McGrath 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-hydorn-mich-1889.