Brooks v. Hartford Insurance

Eleventh Circuit

Brooks v. Hartford Insurance

425 F. App'x 834

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 29, 2011·No. No. 10-15308·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court, in its order of October 13, 2010, dismissed the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim for relief because the complaint was not brought within the two-year limitations period contained in the insurance policy defendant issued plaintiff. Plaintiff now appeals. We find no error in the court’s rationale for dismissing the complaint. The court’s judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court, in its order of October 13, 2010, dismissed the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim for relief because the complaint was not brought within the two-year limitations period contained in the insurance policy defendant issued plaintiff. Plaintiff now appeals. We find no error in the court’s rationale for dismissing the complaint. The court’s judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED.

Brooks v. Hartford Insurance, 425 F. App'x 834 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

425 F. App'x 834 (Brooks v. Hartford Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related