Brooks v. Hartford Insurance

Eleventh Circuit

Brooks v. Hartford Insurance

425 F. App'x 834

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 29, 2011

DocketNo. 10-15308

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 425 F. App'x 834 (Brooks v. Hartford Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. Hartford Insurance, 425 F. App'x 834 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court, in its order of October 13, 2010, dismissed the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim for relief because the complaint was not brought within the two-year limitations period contained in the insurance policy defendant issued plaintiff. Plaintiff now appeals. We find no error in the court’s rationale for dismissing the complaint. The court’s judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court, in its order of October 13, 2010, dismissed the plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim for relief because the complaint was not brought within the two-year limitations period contained in the insurance policy defendant issued plaintiff. Plaintiff now appeals. We find no error in the court’s rationale for dismissing the complaint. The court’s judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

425 F. App'x 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-hartford-insurance-ca11-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack