Brooks v. Harris
This text of 94 N.E.2d 766 (Brooks v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree affirmed. In this petition, brought in the Probate Court by a special administrator, to have determined the title to three accounts in Brookline Savings Bank, Hibernia Savings Bank, and Eliot Savings Bank, respectively, the petitioner has appealed from a final decree adjudging that the respondent Harris is the owner of these accounts. The evidence, which is reported, justified a finding by the judge that on September 22, 1947, the petitioner’s intestate, John F. Houlton, made a completed gift of these accounts to Harris, his son-in-law. Houlton arranged for the transfer of the accounts into the name of Harris and new bank books were issued and delivered to him. American Employers’ Ins. Co. v. Webster, 322 Mass. 161. The judge was not plainly wrong in failing to infer and find, as contended by the [796]*796petitioner, that such transfer was colorable and intended by the intestate to prevent an attachment by his wife in a libel brought by her for divorce. See Doane v. Doane, 238 Mass. 106; Kerwin v. Donaghy, 317 Mass. 559; National Shawmut Bank v. Cumming, 325 Mass. 457.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.E.2d 766, 326 Mass. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-harris-mass-1950.