Brooks v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

27 Mo. App. 573, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 67
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 7, 1887·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hall, J.

In Wallace v. Railroad (74 Mo. 595), an action such as this, for the killing of a colt within the corporate limits of the city of Poplar Bluff, near the defendant’s coal-shed and depot, an instruction, substantially the same as the instruction in the present case, was given. The instruction was held “ faulty in failing to tell the jury that the defendant was liable if it failed to use proper diligence and endeavors to avoid the injury after discovering the animals on the trade.'” This case has since been frequently followed. The rule is that, where an animal, through no fault of the railroad company, gets upon the railroad track at a point where the defendant is not required to anticipate the presence of the animal, the railroad company’s liability is confined to a failure on the part of its servants to use ordinary care to avoid the injury after discovering the peril in which the animal is. Hoffman v. Railroad, 22 Mo. App. 549. The instruction in this case was faulty in not so confining and limiting the defendant’s liability.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 27 Mo. App. 573, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 67 (Mo. Ct. App. 1887).

27 Mo. App. 573 (Brooks v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castor v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad
65 Mo. App. 359 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1896)
Brooks v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
35 Mo. App. 571 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)