Brooks v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
This text of 27 Mo. App. 573 (Brooks v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Wallace v. Railroad (74 Mo. 595), an action such as this, for the killing of a colt within the corporate limits of the city of Poplar Bluff, near the defendant’s coal-shed and depot, an instruction, substantially the same as the instruction in the present case, was given. The instruction was held “ faulty in failing to tell the jury that the defendant was liable if it failed to use proper diligence and endeavors to avoid the injury after discovering the animals on the trade.'” This case has since been frequently followed. The rule is that, where an animal, through no fault of the railroad company, gets upon the railroad track at a point where the defendant is not required to anticipate the presence of the animal, the railroad company’s liability is confined to a failure on the part of its servants to use ordinary care to avoid the injury after discovering the peril in which the animal is. Hoffman v. Railroad, 22 Mo. App. 549. The instruction in this case was faulty in not so confining and limiting the defendant’s liability.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Mo. App. 573, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-hannibal-st-joseph-railroad-moctapp-1887.