Brooks v. Georgia Home Insurance

24 S.E. 869, 99 Ga. 116
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1896·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

A policy of fire insurance stipulating, among other 'things, “that no suit or action against this company for the recovery of any claim by virtue of this policy shall be sustainable in any court, . . unless commenced, within .twelve months next after loss shall have occurred,” an action upon such policy brought more than twelve months after the destruction by fire of the property insured was barred, and 'the court properly granted a nonsuit. See Melson v. Phenix Insurance Co. and Maril v. Some Insurance Co., 97 Ga. 722, and authorities cited. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Georgia Home Insurance, 24 S.E. 869, 99 Ga. 116 (Ga. 1896).

24 S.E. 869 (Brooks v. Georgia Home Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. AMERICAN MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
136 S.E.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Aiken v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance
126 S.E.2d 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Davenport v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.
50 S.E.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Gallivitoch v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
106 S.E. 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Maxwell Bros. v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance
76 S.E. 1036 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Caudle
50 S.E. 337 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Daly v. Concordia Fire Insurance
16 Colo. App. 349 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1901)
Southern Fire Insurance v. Knight
52 L.R.A. 70 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)