Brooks v. Gentry

64 So. 214, 106 Miss. 506
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 64 So. 214 (Brooks v. Gentry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Gentry, 64 So. 214, 106 Miss. 506 (Mich. 1913).

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a motion alleging that the stenographer in the court below has failed to transcribe and-file his notes of the evidence introduced on the trial of the case, and praying for an order directing him to do so “within ten days; . . . otherwise to stand in contempt of the supreme court. ’ ’

This court has no control over the stenographers employed in the courts below. Neither is it charged with the duty of aiding litigants in making up bills of exceptions. All that it can do in this connection is to review the action of the courts below relative thereto.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. City of Water Valley
319 So. 2d 649 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1975)
Geiselbreth v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.
147 So. 874 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Planters' Oil Mill v. Yazoo & M. v. R.
117 So. 242 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)
State v. White
119 So. 807 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 So. 214, 106 Miss. 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-gentry-miss-1913.