Brooks v. General Electric Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Brooks v. General Electric Credit Corp.

243 S.E.2d 635, 145 Ga. App. 407, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2000

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 7, 1978

Docket55216

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 S.E.2d 635 (Brooks v. General Electric Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. General Electric Credit Corp., 243 S.E.2d 635, 145 Ga. App. 407, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2000 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

McMurray, Judge.

Plaintiff, C. C. Brooks, brought this action to recover attorney fees paid under protest (a reservation of rights as to payment of same) to defendant General Electric Credit Corporation of Georgia. The attorney fees arose in connection with the collection of certain indebtedness of the plaintiff to defendant which indebtedness was evidenced by an agreement providing for reasonable attorney fees actually incurred by defendant in the enforcement of its agreements with plaintiff as guarantor of the indebtedness of Bryant Atlanta Corporation.

Plaintiff made a motion for summary judgment. At the hearing of that motion it was stipulated that there was no dispute as to the material facts and that only an issue of law remained. The sole issue is whether the notices sent to plaintiff and his attorney and to Bryant Atlanta Corporation regarding the obligation to pay attorney fees were sufficient to comply with the requirements of Code § 20-506 (c), as amended (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 761, 766; 1953, pp. 545, 546; 1968, p. 317). The court denied plaintiffs motion, and no further issue of law or fact remaining in the case, the court ordered that judgment be granted for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Held:

The failure to meet the exact statutory requirements of Code Ann. § 20-506 (c), supra, will result in dis-allowance of such attorney fees. The requirements include, "stating that the provisions relative to payment of attorney fees appearing in the instrument will be enforced.” Farnan v. Nat. Bank of Ga., 142 Ga. App. 777, [408]*408779 (236 SE2d 923). As there was no reference to provisions in any instrument relative to payment of attorney fees, the letters sent to plaintiff and his attorney and to Bryant Atlanta Corporation did not meet this requirement. See Walton v. Johnson, 213 Ga. 108, 111 (3) (97 SE2d 310); Sockwell v. Pettus, 139 Ga. App. 311 (2) (228 SE2d 343); Adair Realty &c. Co. v. Williams Bros. Lumber Co., 112 Ga. App. 16, 17 (143 SE2d 577); Turk’s Memorial Chapel, Inc. v. Toccoa Casket Co., 134 Ga. App. 71 (213 SE2d 174). Neither did the letters meet the statutory requirement of notification to the plaintiff that he "has 10 days from the receipt of such notice to pay the principal and interest without the attorney’s fees.” Code Ann. § 20-506 (c), supra. The court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Argued February 6, 1978 Decided March 7, 1978 Rehearing denied March 23, 1978 — Cert, applied for. Redfern, Butler & Morgan, Rex M. Lamb, III, for appellant. Harmon, Smith & Bridges, Nolan B. Harmon, Tyrone M. Bridges, Ginger C. Jones, Archer D. Smith, III, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMurray, Judge.

Plaintiff, C. C. Brooks, brought this action to recover attorney fees paid under protest (a reservation of rights as to payment of same) to defendant General Electric Credit Corporation of Georgia. The attorney fees arose in connection with the collection of certain indebtedness of the plaintiff to defendant which indebtedness was evidenced by an agreement providing for reasonable attorney fees actually incurred by defendant in the enforcement of its agreements with plaintiff as guarantor of the indebtedness of Bryant Atlanta Corporation.

Plaintiff made a motion for summary judgment. At the hearing of that motion it was stipulated that there was no dispute as to the material facts and that only an issue of law remained. The sole issue is whether the notices sent to plaintiff and his attorney and to Bryant Atlanta Corporation regarding the obligation to pay attorney fees were sufficient to comply with the requirements of Code § 20-506 (c), as amended (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 761, 766; 1953, pp. 545, 546; 1968, p. 317). The court denied plaintiffs motion, and no further issue of law or fact remaining in the case, the court ordered that judgment be granted for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Held:

The failure to meet the exact statutory requirements of Code Ann. § 20-506 (c), supra, will result in dis-allowance of such attorney fees. The requirements include, "stating that the provisions relative to payment of attorney fees appearing in the instrument will be enforced.” Farnan v. Nat. Bank of Ga., 142 Ga. App. 777, [408]*408779 (236 SE2d 923). As there was no reference to provisions in any instrument relative to payment of attorney fees, the letters sent to plaintiff and his attorney and to Bryant Atlanta Corporation did not meet this requirement. See Walton v. Johnson, 213 Ga. 108, 111 (3) (97 SE2d 310); Sockwell v. Pettus, 139 Ga. App. 311 (2) (228 SE2d 343); Adair Realty &c. Co. v. Williams Bros. Lumber Co., 112 Ga. App. 16, 17 (143 SE2d 577); Turk’s Memorial Chapel, Inc. v. Toccoa Casket Co., 134 Ga. App. 71 (213 SE2d 174). Neither did the letters meet the statutory requirement of notification to the plaintiff that he "has 10 days from the receipt of such notice to pay the principal and interest without the attorney’s fees.” Code Ann. § 20-506 (c), supra. The court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Argued February 6, 1978 Decided March 7, 1978 Rehearing denied March 23, 1978 — Cert, applied for. Redfern, Butler & Morgan, Rex M. Lamb, III, for appellant. Harmon, Smith & Bridges, Nolan B. Harmon, Tyrone M. Bridges, Ginger C. Jones, Archer D. Smith, III, for appellee.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 S.E.2d 635, 145 Ga. App. 407, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-general-electric-credit-corp-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack