Brooks v. Farmer
3 N.J.L. 641
Opinion
The justice has mistaken the law; the act respecting apprentices and servants, cannot, in any shape, be construed as extending to slaves; the penalty created by that act for persuading and enticing away any clerk, apprentice, or servant, does not embrace the case of slaves; it must be confined to the subject matter of the act, which is wholly aside from slaves; besides, the act respecting slaves, has made provision on the same subject by creating a penalty for employing, harboring, or concealing a slave.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Farmer, 3 N.J.L. 641 (N.J. 1810).
3 N.J.L. 641 (Brooks v. Farmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.