Brooks v. Dinnerstein
247 A.D. 848
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The notice of lien states that “ Max Brooks and Isaac Brooks, copartners, doing business as M. Brooks & Son, reside in the town of Rockland, Sullivan County, New York.” This statement is sufficiently descriptive of the residence and place of business of the lienors. Judgment reversed on the law and facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. The court reverses finding of fact numbered sixth. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Dinnerstein, 247 A.D. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 848 (Brooks v. Dinnerstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Malbro Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Straightedge Bldrs., Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 06792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)