Brooks v. Day

11 Iowa 46
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 6, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lowe, C. J.

The defendant brings this cause upon a single question. His bill of exceptions shows that he objected to the introduction as evidence, of the notary’s protest, which accompanied the note, upon the ground that the notary’s certificate did not affirmatively show, that when he addressed through the post office a notice to the defendant, of the presentation and the non-payment of the note, that he paid the postage on the same¡ The objection was overruled and exceptions taken at the time, and now are renewed in this court. We concur in the opinion of the court below, and will presume that a notary public sending such a notice by mail, conformed to the established regulations of the Post Office Department.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Day, 11 Iowa 46 (iowa 1860).

11 Iowa 46 (Brooks v. Day) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central Trust Co. v. City of Des Moines
218 N.W. 580 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
Farmers' Mill & Grain Co. v. De Franco
31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 485 (Cuyahoga Circuit Court, 1906)