Brooks v. Commonwealth

32 S.W. 403, 98 Ky. 143, 1895 Ky. LEXIS 28
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 16, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 32 S.W. 403 (Brooks v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Commonwealth, 32 S.W. 403, 98 Ky. 143, 1895 Ky. LEXIS 28 (Ky. Ct. App. 1895).

Opinion

JUDGE LEWIS

DELIVERED. THE OPINION OF THE COURT.

Section 124, Criminal Code, requires an indictment to be direct and certain as regards, first, the party charged; second, tlie offense charged; third, the comity charged; fourth, the particular circumstances of the offense charged, if they be necessary to constitute a complete offénse.

The indictment in this case, or so much as is necessary to quote, is as follows: “The grand jury of Boone county, in the name and by tlie authority of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse Lee H. Brooks of the offense of suffering and permitting-on his premises, committed as follows;” etc.

The particular circumstances of the offense of suffering [144]*144and permitting gaming upon the premises of defendant are with sufficient certainty and directness stated in the indictment ; but that does not supersede or dispense with the other requirement, equally imperative, that the indictment shall be direct and certain as to the offense charged. No offense at all is here charged, and not to hold the indictment defective on that account would be to disregard a plain and indispensable requisite.

For the error in overruling the demurrer to the indictment the judgment must be reversed and cause remanded for that to be done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Commonwealth
89 S.W.2d 3 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Acree v. Commonwealth
243 Ky. 216 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1932)
Acree v. Commonwealth
47 S.W.2d 1051 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Commonwealth v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.
44 S.W.2d 830 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Patrick v. Commonwealth
7 S.W.2d 1039 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1928)
Deaton and Boggs v. Commonwealth
295 S.W. 167 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)
Little v. Commonwealth
265 S.W. 433 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Lakes v. Commonwealth
251 S.W. 982 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Forman v. Commonwealth
243 S.W. 1043 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Elliott v. Commonwealth
240 S.W. 61 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Mays & Terry v. Commonwealth
240 S.W. 58 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Lovelace v. Commonwealth
236 S.W. 567 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1922)
Bennett v. Commonwealth
150 S.W. 806 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Commonwealth v. Tobin
130 S.W. 1116 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1910)
Commonwealth v. Schatzman
82 S.W. 238 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1904)
State v. Gates
69 P. 385 (Washington Supreme Court, 1902)
State v. Belyea
83 N.W. 1 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 S.W. 403, 98 Ky. 143, 1895 Ky. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1895.