Brooks v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Brooks v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

1 So. 2d 813, 1941 La. App. LEXIS 348

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 4, 1941

DocketNo. 6244.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 So. 2d 813 (Brooks v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooks v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 1 So. 2d 813, 1941 La. App. LEXIS 348 (La. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Presumably the appeal perfected in this cause, which is an action sounding in tort, has been abandoned; for appellant has made no appearance whatever in this court in its behalf. Under circumstances of this nature, the proper decree is one dismissing the appeal. Bridges v. Gantt, La.App., 187 So. 829, Calhoun v. Hodges, La.App., 174 So. 209, and cases therein cited.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed at appellant's costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Presumably the appeal perfected in this cause, which is an action sounding in tort, has been abandoned; for appellant has made no appearance whatever in this court in its behalf. Under circumstances of this nature, the proper decree is one dismissing the appeal. Bridges v. Gantt, La.App., 187 So. 829, Calhoun v. Hodges, La.App., 174 So. 209, and cases therein cited.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed at appellant's costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 2d 813, 1941 La. App. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-coca-cola-bottling-co-lactapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack