Brooks v. City of Seattle

623 F.3d 911, 2010 WL 3896202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooks v. City of Seattle. Read the opinion of the Court — 599 F.3d 1018
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2010·No. 08-35526·Published

Opinion

623 F.3d 911 (2010)

Malaika BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant, and
Steven L. Daman, in his capacity as an officer of the Seattle Police Department; Donald M. Jones, in his individual capacity as an officer of the Seattle Police Department; Juan M. Ornelas, in his individual capacity as an officer of the Seattle Police Department, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 08-035526.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

September 30, 2010.

Eric L. Zubel, Esquire, Eric Zubel PC, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ted Buck, Esquire, Karen Cobb, Stafford Frey Cooper, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellants.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. City of Seattle, 623 F.3d 911, 2010 WL 3896202 (9th Cir. 2010).

623 F.3d 911 (Brooks v. City of Seattle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.