Brooks v. City of Beaverton

643 P.2d 351, 56 Or. App. 601, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2840
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 29, 1982
DocketNo. 40-162, CA A20904
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 643 P.2d 351 (Brooks v. City of Beaverton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. City of Beaverton, 643 P.2d 351, 56 Or. App. 601, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2840 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The order provides, in relevant part:

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
“1) Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied.
“2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
“3) Defendants may recover their costs and disbursements.”

The order disposes of the motions but does not decide the case. Accordingly, it is not appealable. ORS 19.010; Ensley v. Fitzwater, 55 Or App 737, 639 P2d 716 (1982).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Parker
679 P.2d 351 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
643 P.2d 351, 56 Or. App. 601, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-city-of-beaverton-orctapp-1982.