Brooks v. City of Beaverton
643 P.2d 351, 56 Or. App. 601, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2840
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 29, 1982·No. No. 40-162, CA A20904·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The order provides, in relevant part:
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
“1) Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied.
“2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
“3) Defendants may recover their costs and disbursements.”
The order disposes of the motions but does not decide the case. Accordingly, it is not appealable. ORS 19.010; Ensley v. Fitzwater, 55 Or App 737, 639 P2d 716 (1982).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. City of Beaverton, 643 P.2d 351, 56 Or. App. 601, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 2840 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
643 P.2d 351 (Brooks v. City of Beaverton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Parker
679 P.2d 351 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)