Brooks v. Calderwood

19 Cal. 124
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 19 Cal. 124 (Brooks v. Calderwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Calderwood, 19 Cal. 124 (Cal. 1861).

Opinion

Field, C. J.

Cope, J. concurring.—Ordered Ordered that the appeal be dismissed, on the authority of the case cited by the respondent.

[125]*125Subsequently, appellant applied for a rehearing, contending that by stipulation the case was submitted on its merits.

Field, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court —Cope, J. concurring.

As no appeal lies from the order refusing to transfer the cause to the Circuit Court of the United States for trial, this Court has no jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the application of the defendant, even with the stipulation of the parties. It will be time enough to consider the merits when the case is properly before us.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schlyen v. Schlyen
273 P.2d 897 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
Estate of Hanley v. Hanley
142 P.2d 423 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Athey v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
165 P. 1116 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
State ex rel. Combination Silver Mining Co. v. Curler
4 Nev. 445 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Cal. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-calderwood-cal-1861.