Brooks v. Brooks
This text of 235 A.D. 743 (Brooks v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss counterclaim in defendant’s answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to amend his answer by pleading the facts stated in the counterclaim as a defense, upon payment of ten dollars costs. The matters pleaded as a counterclaim may constitute a defense, but may not be pleaded as a counterclaim. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-brooks-nyappdiv-1932.