Brooks v. Brooks
This text of 336 S.W.2d 561 (Brooks v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Bell Circuit Court for $1,820 and interest for accrued rent due under a contract and lease of gasoline service station property.
We concur in the conclusion of the trial court that the defense offered constituted an oral modification of a definite and clear written contract rather than being a supplement or different agreement; hence, the defense may not be sustained.
Motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
336 S.W.2d 561, 1960 Ky. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-brooks-kyctapp-1960.