Brooks v. Brooks, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedJanuary 14, 1999
Docket03A01-9801-CH-00008
StatusPublished

This text of Brooks v. Brooks, Jr. (Brooks v. Brooks, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Brooks, Jr., (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

I N T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E FILED A T K N O X V I L L E January 14, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appe llate Court Clerk

P A M E L A A N N D R I N N O N B R O O K S , ) C / A N O . 0 3 A 0 1 - 9 8 0 1 - C H - 0 0 0 0 8 ) P l a i n t i f f - A p p e l l a n t , ) ) ) ) v . ) A P P E A L A S O F R I G H T F R O M T H E ) H A M B L E N C O U N T Y D O M E S T I C R E L A T I O N S C O U R T ) ) ) ) J A C K T H O M A S B R O O K S , J R . , ) ) H O N O R A B L E J O Y C E M . W A R D , D e f e n d a n t - A p p e l l e e . ) J U D G E

F o r A p p e l l a n t F o r A p p e l l e e

J I M W . S T A M B A U G H J I L L R . T A L L E Y S t a m b a u g h L a w O f f i c e D a n d r i d g e , T e n n e s s e e M o r r i s t o w n , T e n n e s s e e

M E M O R A N D U M O P IN IO N

1 A F F I R M E D A N D R E M A N D E D S u s a n o , J . P a m e l a A n n D r i n n o n T u r n e r , f o r m e r l y B r o o k s , f i l e d a

p o s t - d i v o r c e p e t i t i o n s e e k i n g s o l e c u s t o d y o f t h e p a r t i e s ’ m i n o r

c h i l d , W i l l i a m C l a y t o n B r o o k s ( D O B : O c t o b e r 5 , 1 9 9 0 ) . T h e t r i a l

c o u r t h e l d , i n e f f e c t , t h a t t h e r e h a d n o t b e e n a s u f f i c i e n t

c h a n g e i n c i r c u m s t a n c e s t o w a r r a n t a c h a n g e i n t h e j o i n t c u s t o d y

a r r a n g e m e n t p r e v i o u s l y d e c r e e d b y t h e c o u r t . I t d e n i e d t h e

p e t i t i o n a n d M r s . T u r n e r a p p e a l e d , a r g u i n g t h a t t h e e v i d e n c e

p r e p o n d e r a t e s a g a i n s t t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s f i n d i n g s .

A t r i a l c o u r t h a s b r o a d d i s c r e t i o n r e g a r d i n g a c u s t o d y

d e t e r m i n a t i o n . B r u m i t v . B r u m i t , 9 4 8 S . W . 2 d 7 3 9 , 7 4 0 ( T e n n . A p p .

1 9 9 7 ) . W e w i l l n o t d i s t u r b s u c h a d e t e r m i n a t i o n u n l e s s t h e

r e c o r d r e f l e c t s a n a b u s e o f t h a t d i s c r e t i o n . I d .

W e f i n d a n d h o l d t h a t t h e e v i d e n c e d o e s n o t

p r e p o n d e r a t e a g a i n s t t h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t t h e

f a c t s b e f o r e i t d i d n o t w a r r a n t a c h a n g e i n t h e c u s t o d i a l

a r r a n g e m e n t . W e f i n d n o a b u s e o f d i s c r e t i o n i n t h i s c a s e .

A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e t r i a l c o u r t i s a f f i r m e d . O u r

a f f i r m a n c e i s p u r s u a n t t o t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f R u l e 1 0 ( b ) , R u l e s o f 1 t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s . C o s t s o n a p p e a l a r e t a x e d a g a i n s t t h e

1 R u l e 1 0 ( b ) , R u l e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A p p e a l s , p r o v i d e s a s f o l l o w s :

T h e C o u r t , w i t h t h e c o n c u r r e n c e o f a l l j u d g e s p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e c a s e , m a y a f f i r m , r e v e r s e o r m o d i f y t h e a c t i o n s o f t h e t r i a l c o u r t b y m e m o r a n d u m o p i n i o n w h e n a f o r m a l o p i n i o n w o u l d h a v e n o

2 a p p e l l a n t . T h i s c a s e i s r e m a n d e d t o t h e t r i a l c o u r t f o r

e n f o r c e m e n t o f t h a t c o u r t ’ s j u d g m e n t a n d c o l l e c t i o n o f c o s t s

a s s e s s e d b e l o w , a l l p u r s u a n t t o a p p l i c a b l e l a w .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C h a r l e s D . S u s a n o , J r . , J .

C O N C U R :

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H o u s t o n M . G o d d a r d , P . J .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H e r s c h e l P . F r a n k s , J .

p r e c e d e n t i a l v a l u e . W h e n a c a s e i s d e c i d e d b y m e m o r a n d u m o p i n i o n i t s h a l l b e d e s i g n a t e d “ M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N , ” s h a l l n o t b e p u b l i s h e d , a n d s h a l l n o t b e c i t e d o r r e l i e d o n f o r a n y r e a s o n i n a s u b s e q u e n t u n r e l a t e d c a s e .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brooks v. Brooks, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-brooks-jr-tennctapp-1999.