Brooks v. Ault
This text of 188 S.E.2d 799 (Brooks v. Ault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eddie Brooks, appellant, was convicted in Fulton Superior Court of armed robbery and sentenced to 16 years in the penitentiary, and is serving that sentence. He filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after hearing, was remanded to the custody of the respondent. His appeal is from that judgment.
1. Enumerated errors 1, 2, and 3, alleging that there was no evidence to support the verdict, that the State failed to prove all the essential elements of the crime charged, and that the court failed to charge all elements of the crime charged, are not meritorious for the reason that the writ of habeas corpus is never a substitute for a review to correct errors of law, "nor can it be used as a second appeal for such purpose. It is an appropriate remedy only when the judgment or sentence under which applicant is being restrained is not merely erroneous but absolutely void.” Ferguson v. Balkcom, 222 Ga. 676, 677 (151 SE2d 707); Bonner v. Smith, 226 Ga. 250 (3) (174 SE2d 438); Barrett v. Smith, 227 Ga. 358 (2) (180 SE2d 698).
2. Enumerated error 4, alleging ineffectiveness of counsel, is without merit. The trial judge found that the appellant was ably represented by counsel, and the record supports that finding.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 S.E.2d 799, 228 Ga. 863, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-ault-ga-1972.