Brooks (Michael) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 2021·No. 83608·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL RONALD BROOKS,

Appellant,

No. 83542 FILED

vs. OCT 28 2132 THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIZABETH A. BROWN Respondent. CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY Ç.

DEPLflY CLE

MICHAEL RONALD BROOKS, No. 83608 • Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

These are pro se appeals from judgments of conviction. This court's review of these appeals reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgments of conviction on July 16, 2021. Appellant did not file the notices of appeal, however, until September 21, 2021, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). Because an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court, Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeals, and ORDERS these appeals DISMISSED.'

J.

Cadish

Pickering

Piek. Herndon

J

"Based on this dismissal, the court takes no action in regard to the pro se letter filed in Docket No. 83608.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(C) I947A arlett.

cc: Hon. Kathleen M. Drakulich, District Judge Michael Ronald Brooks Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1447A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks (Michael) Vs. State, (Neb. 2021).

Brooks (Michael) Vs. State (Brooks (Michael) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)