Brooks-Callaway Co. v. Macon Concrete Roller Co.
This text of 279 F. 114 (Brooks-Callaway Co. v. Macon Concrete Roller Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant complains of that part of the decree appealed from which held valid and infringed claims 5 and 6 of the Ashmore & Morgan patent, No. 1,273,022, for a process and device for finishing concrete pavements. We have reached the conclusion that the court did not err in so holding. For a statement of the reasons relied on to support that conclusion, nothing more is needed than an expression of our approval of the opinion rendered by the District Judge. Macon Concrete Roller Co. v. Brooks-Callaway Co., 272 Fed. 341.
The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 F. 114, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-callaway-co-v-macon-concrete-roller-co-ca5-1922.