Brooks-Callaway Co. v. Macon Concrete Roller Co.

279 F. 114, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1510
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 24, 1922·No. No. 3758·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant complains of that part of the decree appealed from which held valid and infringed claims 5 and 6 of the Ashmore & Morgan patent, No. 1,273,022, for a process and device for finishing concrete pavements. We have reached the conclusion that the court did not err in so holding. For a statement of the reasons relied on to support that conclusion, nothing more is needed than an expression of our approval of the opinion rendered by the District Judge. Macon Concrete Roller Co. v. Brooks-Callaway Co., 272 Fed. 341.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks-Callaway Co. v. Macon Concrete Roller Co., 279 F. 114, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 1510 (5th Cir. 1922).

279 F. 114 (Brooks-Callaway Co. v. Macon Concrete Roller Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related