Brooks, Bill v. McDonald, Mary

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 6, 2012·No. 05-12-00265-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed Opinion issued November 6. 2012

In The (!nurt tif A11at! fiftI! tIitrirt uf Lrxai it t1a11wi No. 05-I 2-00265-C 1

BILL BROOKS, Appellant

V.

MARY MCDONALD, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. I Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-08551-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and rVlyers

On February 20, 2012, appellant tiled a notice of appeal in this case. On October 8, 2012,

appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. On October 19, 2012, we

ordered appellant to respond to the motion to dismiss within ten (lays. Appellant has not responded

or otherwise communicated with this Court regarding his appeal.

Accordingly, we GRANT appel lee’s October 8, 2012 motion and DISMISS this appeal. See

TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(l).

PER CURIAM

120265F.P05 (!tiiirt iif ptah .Fift1i Jiitriri nf xw it Ozi11zu

JUDGMENT BILL BROOKS, Appellant Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas, (Tr.Ct.No. CC-il No. 05- 12-00265-CV 0855 I-A). Oiinion delivered per curiam before Justices MARY MCDONALD, Appellee Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DiSMISSED. Appellee is ORDERED to recover her costs of this appeal from appellant.

Judgment entered November 6, 2012.

LANA MYERS .1 U ST ICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks, Bill v. McDonald, Mary, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Brooks, Bill v. McDonald, Mary (Brooks, Bill v. McDonald, Mary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.