Brooks (Anthony) Vs. The Second Judicial Dist. Ct.
This text of Brooks (Anthony) Vs. The Second Judicial Dist. Ct. (Brooks (Anthony) Vs. The Second Judicial Dist. Ct.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ANTHONY BROOKS, No. 79237 Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF AUG 0 8 2C19 WASHOE, Res • ondent.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to file the motions petitioner contends he has submitted below. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,
SUPREME COURT
1.3stiol Of NEVADA
(0) 1947A ctlairk 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioned carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Pickering Hardesty
cc: Anthony Brooks Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brooks (Anthony) Vs. The Second Judicial Dist. Ct., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-anthony-vs-the-second-judicial-dist-ct-nev-2019.