Brooklyn Windshield Corp. v. Rosenblatt

233 A.D. 687

This text of 233 A.D. 687 (Brooklyn Windshield Corp. v. Rosenblatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooklyn Windshield Corp. v. Rosenblatt, 233 A.D. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. In our opinion the trial court was without power to appoint a referee to take and state the account of the plaintiff’s alleged damages inasmuch as they were an issue presented by the pleadings and triable before the court. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooklyn-windshield-corp-v-rosenblatt-nyappdiv-1931.