Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization

87 A.D.2d 720, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16062

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 720 (Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 87 A.D.2d 720, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court" of. Appeals: “Did this court err in reversing Special Term’s order granting petitioner’s motion for permission to file supplemental appraisal reports on the ground that such order constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law?” Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court" of. Appeals: “Did this court err in reversing Special Term’s order granting petitioner’s motion for permission to file supplemental appraisal reports on the ground that such order constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law?” Kane, J. P., Casey, Mikoll and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 720, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooklyn-union-gas-co-v-state-board-of-equalization-nyappdiv-1982.