Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New York

115 A.D. 69, 100 N.Y.S. 625, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3620
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 5, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 115 A.D. 69 (Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New York, 115 A.D. 69, 100 N.Y.S. 625, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

The rule is that public service corporations may charge only a reasonable rate, and the courts may ascertain such rate in a given case. But this-rule has no application where the legislature .has fixed the rate. The people through their representatives assembled in legislature have the undoubted power to fix the rate which public service corporations shall charge the public. That is a legislative matter.' If the legislature fix the fare too high the people may elect legislative representatives who will lower it. The courts have no power to lower it. It is not for the courts to upset what the people do by their legislative representatives, except in the case of a legislative act which is contrary to some provision of the Constitution, of which there can be no pretense here. The claim that the rate fixed by the legislature is excessive is a tiling to be addressed to the next legislature, not to the courts. The people speak through the legislature, every one being represented therein, and thereby voluntarily bind themselves and all. the subdivisions of their government. The case is not one calling for an extended discussion. It rests upon the fundamental principle of representative, government.

The cost of the production of gas to the plaintiff is therefore an immaterial fact in this case. The plaintiff had the right to charge not to exceed the maximum price fixed by the statute.

The order should be affirmed.

Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.
224 P.2d 155 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1950)
Follett v. Water Works Co.
123 Misc. 825 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
Coshun v. Hurlburt
201 P. 870 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)
Morrell v. Brooklyn Borough Gas Co.
113 Misc. 65 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)
Wishkah Boom Co. v. Greenwood Timber Co.
153 P. 367 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
St. Paul Book & Stationery Co. v. St. Paul Gaslight Co.
153 N.W. 262 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)
City of Mount Vernon v. New York Inter Urban Water Co.
115 A.D. 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D. 69, 100 N.Y.S. 625, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooklyn-union-gas-co-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1906.