Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York

168 N.E. 438, 251 N.Y. 589, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 848
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 N.Y. 495
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 1929·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument or to amend remittitur. (See 250 N. Y. 495.)

Per Curiam.

The opinion should be limited as applicable to the facts appearing in the record. It was not the intention of this court to indicate its opinion as to the liability of the plaintiff to pay taxes upon the property in question or other maintenance charges. This court decided only that upon the facts disclosed in the record the plaintiff could not recover from the defendant the sums which it had paid for insurance and interest on the mortgages.

The motion for reargument or to amend the remittitur should be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York, 168 N.E. 438, 251 N.Y. 589, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 848 (N.Y. 1929).

168 N.E. 438 (Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooklyn Public Library v. City of New York
166 N.E. 179 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)