Brooklyn Majestic Theatre Co. v. Vitagraph Co. of America
135 N.E. 968, 233 N.Y. 682, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1107
This text of 135 N.E. 968 (Brooklyn Majestic Theatre Co. v. Vitagraph Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brooklyn Majestic Theatre Co. v. Vitagraph Co. of America, 135 N.E. 968, 233 N.Y. 682, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1107 (N.Y. 1922).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ. Dissenting: Andrews, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Firm Amusement Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
65 Misc. 2d 25 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 N.E. 968, 233 N.Y. 682, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooklyn-majestic-theatre-co-v-vitagraph-co-of-america-ny-1922.