Brooklyn Cooperage Company v. . the A. Sherman Lumber Co.

115 N.E. 715, 220 N.Y. 642, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1098
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 6, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 115 N.E. 715 (Brooklyn Cooperage Company v. . the A. Sherman Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooklyn Cooperage Company v. . the A. Sherman Lumber Co., 115 N.E. 715, 220 N.Y. 642, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1098 (N.Y. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action for trespass. The complaint demands judgment for a sum of money only. Plaintiff and defendant both claim title to the lands. The defendant claims to have acquired the title of respondent’s testator with covenants of warranty, and quiet enjoyment. Respondent has been notified to defend the action.

In an action at law where the plaintiff seeks a money judgment only, he cannot be compelled under section 452 of the Code of Civil Procedure to bring in as a defendant a third party on the application of the latter. (Bauer v. Dewey, 166 N. Y. 402; Garrigues Co. v. Casualty Co. of America, 220 N. Y. 588.)

The subject of this action is the alleged trespass. Respondent has no title to or interest in the property, real or personal, described in the complaint which can be affected by the judgment, and, therefore, no interest in the subject of the action. She may be interested in or affected by the result but that is not enough. The plaintiff has no interest in the possible claim of the defendant against the respondent. If it makes her party to this action it cannot state a cause of action against her or obtain any relief' against her.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the order of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Hisoock, Oh. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Motorship Corp. v. Johnson & Higgins
192 Misc. 401 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Ladue v. Goodhead
181 Misc. 807 (New York County Courts, 1943)
United States v. Certain Lands in Town of Highlands
48 F. Supp. 303 (S.D. New York, 1942)
Town of Irondequoit v. County of Monroe
171 Misc. 125 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Hoffman v. Bardusch
229 A.D. 210 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Wilcox v. . the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
139 N.E. 746 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Fedden v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal
204 A.D. 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Bulova v. E. L. Barnett, Inc.
194 A.D. 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 N.E. 715, 220 N.Y. 642, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooklyn-cooperage-company-v-the-a-sherman-lumber-co-ny-1917.