Brooklyn City Railroad v. Whalen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brooklyn City Railroad v. Whalen

192 A.D. 886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1920

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D. 886 (Brooklyn City Railroad v. Whalen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooklyn City Railroad v. Whalen, 192 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out the amended answer reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. We are not prepared to say that the allegations contained in the amended answer were so palpably without merit as to justify the conclusion that the purpose of the inter[887]*887position of that pleading was for delay. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out the amended answer reversed, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. We are not prepared to say that the allegations contained in the amended answer were so palpably without merit as to justify the conclusion that the purpose of the inter[887]*887position of that pleading was for delay. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooklyn-city-railroad-v-whalen-nyappdiv-1920.