Brooklyn Building Material Co. v. De Goods

123 Misc. 917, 206 N.Y.S. 678, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1245
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 13, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The summons was amendable in so far as to correct an error in plaintiff’s address, and the motion to change venue was properly denied.

Order denying motion to change venue affirmed. The order granting judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings was erroneous. This may have been a case for application for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, but the motion was not made under that rule.

Order granting judgment on the pleadings and judgment entered thereon reversed, with costs to appellant to abide the event, and eause remanded to the Municipal Court for trial or proper motion.

[918] Judgment and order granting judgment on pleadings reversed, with ten dollars costs, and case ordered placed on the general calendar. Order denying change of venue affirmed.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooklyn Building Material Co. v. De Goods, 123 Misc. 917, 206 N.Y.S. 678, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

123 Misc. 917 (Brooklyn Building Material Co. v. De Goods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malik v. Cukrowski
172 Misc. 2d 360 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)
Barrow v. Hadcox
47 Misc. 2d 435 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)