Brookins v. State
275 S.W.3d 831, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2009 WL 306408
Opinion
Order
While on parole, Appellant pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. After an evidentiary hearing on his Rule 24.035 motion, where he contended he was led to believe his sentence would run concurrent to the prior sentence, and that he would get credit for jail time after parole revocation, his motion was denied. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brookins v. State, 275 S.W.3d 831, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2009 WL 306408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
275 S.W.3d 831 (Brookins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.