Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Brookins v. Hecht

Brookins v. Hecht

235 A.D. 793
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brookins v. Hecht. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 A.D. 792 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1932·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order of the City Court of White Plains affirmed, with costs, upon the grounds stated in Brookins v. Hecht (ante, p. 792), decided herewith. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagerty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Young, J., dissents, for the reasons stated by him in the same case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brookins v. Hecht, 235 A.D. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 793 (Brookins v. Hecht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.