Brookfield v. Hecker
114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4903
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedFebruary 17, 1902
StatusPublished
This text of 114 F. 1021 (Brookfield v. Hecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brookfield v. Hecker, 114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4903 (circtsdny 1902).
Opinion
The court, on the argument, gathered the impression that, as to tlio use of the trade-name “Can’t be Beat,” defendants conceded that they had no right to use it and agreed to desist. As to all other relief now asked for, application for injunction in advance of final hearing must be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brookfield-v-hecker-circtsdny-1902.