Brookes v. Stephens Floor Covering, Inc.

207 S.W.3d 210, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1793, 2006 WL 3410687
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 28, 2006·No. No. ED 87735·Published

Opinion

[211] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Brookes (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his compensation claim against Stephens Floor Covering, Inc. (“Employer”). Claimant contends that because his Employer failed to file its report of injury in accord with the requirements of Section 287.380, the Commission should have applied the three-year statute of limitations contained in Section 287.430.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The award is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brookes v. Stephens Floor Covering, Inc., 207 S.W.3d 210, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1793, 2006 WL 3410687 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

207 S.W.3d 210 (Brookes v. Stephens Floor Covering, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection
121 S.W.3d 220 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2003)