Brookes v. Chesley

4 H. & McH. 295
General Court of Virginia·Decided May 15, 1799·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Chase, Ch. J.

The jurymen and witnesses, during their attendance on the court, are privileged from arrest? but it is a privilege of the court, and not of the party. Calvert county court, whose business might have been impeded by the arrest, could have discharged the defendant from it; but as soon as he was discharged from attending the court, he would be liable to be taken again on the same process. This court cannot discharge the defendant. His privilege ceased as soon as the county court discharged him from attending as a juryman. If this court were to discharge him, it would put the plaintiff hack without any fault of his, but by the fault of the sheriff in serving the process at an Improper time.

Motion overruíeb»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brookes v. Chesley, 4 H. & McH. 295 (Va. Super. Ct. 1799).

4 H. & McH. 295 (Brookes v. Chesley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. & H. STABLES, INC. v. Robinson
157 A.2d 451 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)
Long v. Hawken
79 A. 190 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1911)