Brooker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Brooker v. State

699 So. 2d 1046, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11228, 1997 WL 615019

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 1997

DocketNo. 96-3169

StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 1046 (Brooker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brooker v. State, 699 So. 2d 1046, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11228, 1997 WL 615019 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the plea colloquy and sentencing order, we conclude that the plea agreement was for a sentence as a habitual violent felony offender, including the mandatory minimum sentences associated therewith. See § 775.084(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988); Brister v. State, 622 So.2d 552, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). That being so, the mandatory minimum sentences were within the legal authority of the court to impose. The order denying motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the plea colloquy and sentencing order, we conclude that the plea agreement was for a sentence as a habitual violent felony offender, including the mandatory minimum sentences associated therewith. See § 775.084(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988); Brister v. State, 622 So.2d 552, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). That being so, the mandatory minimum sentences were within the legal authority of the court to impose. The order denying motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

699 So. 2d 1046, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11228, 1997 WL 615019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooker-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack