Brooker v. State
362 So. 2d 719
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 1978·No. No. 77-1832·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1977), requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Knight v. State, supra. Therefore, we remand the case for correction of the sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooker v. State, 362 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
362 So. 2d 719 (Brooker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Town of Longboat Key v. Carl E. Widell & Son
362 So. 2d 719 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)