Brooker v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

224 So. 3d 816, 2017 WL 3399829, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 2017
DocketCase No. 2D16-494
StatusPublished

This text of 224 So. 3d 816 (Brooker v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooker v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 224 So. 3d 816, 2017 WL 3399829, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

SLEET, Judge.

Ruby L. Brooker appeals the final judgment of foreclosure entered against her and in favor of Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. We reverse because Ocwen failed to prove that it complied with paragraph twenty-two of the mortgage and the note’s contractual requirement to mail a notice of default to Brooker as a condition precedent to foreclosure. The breach letter was not admitted into evidence, and without record proof that Ocwen complied with the condition precedent, we must reverse and remand for dismissal of Ocwen’s foreclosure action. See Blum v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co., 159 So.3d 920, 920-21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Reversed and remanded.

LUCAS, J., and JOSEPH G. FOSTER, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bruce L. Blum v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Americas as Trustee
159 So. 3d 920 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 So. 3d 816, 2017 WL 3399829, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooker-v-ocwen-loan-servicing-llc-fladistctapp-2017.