Brooker v. Commissioner, NH

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided May 13, 1996·No. 95-1545·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



May 13, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 95-1545

SCOTT PHILIP BROOKER,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Cyr and Lynch,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Scott Philip Brooker on brief pro se. ____________________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record and ___________

plaintiff's arguments. We affirm for the reasons stated in

the district court's May 4, 1995 order of dismissal.

Affirmed. ________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooker v. Commissioner, NH, (1st Cir. 1996).

Brooker v. Commissioner, NH (Brooker v. Commissioner, NH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.