Brooke v. State

334 So. 2d 818
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1976·No. No. Z-396·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Rouse, Fla.App. 4th, 239 So.2d 79 (1970); State v. Liptak, Fla., 227 So.2d 19 (1973), and Langley v. State, Fla.App. 1st, 292 So.2d 613 (1974).

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooke v. State, 334 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

334 So. 2d 818 (Brooke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rouse
239 So. 2d 79 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Succession of Bates
227 So. 2d 19 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
Langley v. State
292 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)